By Joe Gysel
President EPCOR Water USA
I agree that we need to high grade the action items and the two that we have identified to tackle immediately represent tough challenges that have been in play for a long time as well as the important attention to the appropriate funding of the Water Resources dept. They send a good message that the group is both forward thinking and practical in its approach.
Personally I believe that the Kyl Center for Water policy can also fill a much needed role in socializing the value of water, it’s importance as well as the economic realities regarding cost of water and pricing. As independent academic think tanks they can tackle sensitive issues that need to be discussed and addressed for Arizona to move to sustainable water supply and demand. The Arizona Water Consciousness Challenge is the beginning of raising awareness and will need further ongoing support from both Morrison Institute and Kyl Center to gain meaningful ground and momentum on this topic.
Re the water action items short and medium term 3,4,5&6. It looks like you have combined some groupings and edited. My comments are as follows:
Action 4 - Increased use of treated waste water – Currently treated waste water is put to use at many facilities. At EPCOR AZ, we are responsible for about 10.5 MGD of waste water. All is treated to required standards with 4 MGD used for recharge, 3 MGD used of golf courses, water features/common areas (schools and parks) and 3.5MGD is sent to APS via Tolleson. The move to direct potable has a number of benefits and moves us up the value chain however we do take away from other uses currently developed. We need to address the whole picture including current uses for treated waste water. States and countries ie Singapore where they are using direct potable are a response to a severe lack of water supply source. AZ is not there at this point in time so we need to focus on setting standards and socializing the acceptability of direct potable waste water reuse should we be faced with critical supply shortages. The major issue is consumer acceptance and as we are fortunate not to be on the “burning platform” we should begin efforts to ensure future supply constraints which force alternate sources are socialized so that with Direct potable reuse is an acceptable result.
Action 5 – Conservation (including messaging on water scarcity issue) – I raised the controversial issue of water pricing at our session. There were pros and cons on priority from various members of the group. I feel that it is an essential part of any conservation or sustainable consumption plan in order drive the right behavior. As pointed out it is a very complicated subject however who better than Morrison Inst and Kyl Center to set the tone on the right pricing mechanisms. If lead by private water it is viewed as greedy profits, if lead by municipalities it is another tax. The cost of water will be going up in all areas. CAP water will face increased costs of pumping based on Navajo generating station changes. Desalination costs, while declining are still well above any costs we face for surface or ground water. EPCOR’s cost of ground water at plant averages $.42-.72/kgal and current surface water treated at our White Tanks and Anthem plants averages $1.23 - $1.69/kgal based on current CAP pricing. Ocean desalination by comparison currently ranges from $7-$10/kgal depending on energy costs. These are all a plant gate costs so one can imagine the impacts on water rates and associated concerns by consumers if not prepared for prices that could increase 5 fold or more.
Further complicating the issue of pricing are the traditional rate structures that have bundled infrastructure costs with those of the commodity and tend to mask the true cost of water. This makes it difficult to incent the right consumption behaviors as conservation efforts are largely driven through tiered pricing which puts utility financial stability at risk.
Water pricing needs to be part of this conversation and the value of water.
Longer term – Action 7 - Augmentation of water resources. In addition to looking at traditional models new funding mechanisms leveraging the private sector should be explored. P3 projects continue to gain momentum in many infrastructure sectors including water and waste water. Tightening municipal, state and federal budgets make this form of project delivery attractive. EPCOR recently won the $200M waste water treatment plant project in Regina Sask under this model. The City of San Antonio recently approve their estimated $3.4 billion P3 contract to develop a new large scale water supply project for the city which will deliver 168,970 m3/day of water (50,000 acre-feet per year) through a 142 mile pipeline. The consortium will deliver the project under a 30-year concession agreement which involves the design, build, finance, operation and maintenance of new production wells from the Carrizo and Simsboro Aquifers, pumping stations, raw water collection, storage tanks and transportation. For large infrastructure projects these delivery models present attractive alternatives and can supplement traditional models.
The Kyl Center for Water Policy at Morrison Institute seeks to generate policy proposals for public evaluation and subsequent consideration for possible action or adoption. An Arizona State University resource, the Kyl Center promotes research, analysis, collaboration and open dialogue to identify opportunities for consensus to ensure sound water stewardship for Arizona and the Western region for generations to come.
Wednesday, November 12, 2014
Updates on Kyl Water Center, new director's job
By Thom Reilly, director of Morrison Institute for Public Policy
Thank you for your continued interest and participation in this foundational work of the Kyl Center for Water Policy at MI. A recap of our meeting of October 24th is as follows:
Thank you for your continued interest and participation in this foundational work of the Kyl Center for Water Policy at MI. A recap of our meeting of October 24th is as follows:
- The group agreed that the first two priorities of Kyl Center for Water Policy should be: 1) exploring more efficient ways of resolving stream and other water rights adjudications and 2) identifying potential financing mechanisms for ADWR and later augmentation. See the attached Draft Initial Plan for details.
- We will form small groups to further work on each of these two areas. We would like to expand the group to include all stakeholders. If you are interested in participating in either of these groups, or If you know of anyone else who should be brought into these discussions, please forward their names (and contact information if possible) to Dan Hunting at dan.hunting@asu.edu <mailto:dan.hunting@asu.edu> . The group studying adjudications will meet on November 24th from 1 to 3 in the afternoon. The location for that meeting is yet to be determined.
- There was also consensus that the broad outlines of the solution framework set forth at the meeting can guide the Center’s work. Please see the attached Water Action Items document. We have formed an advisory board for the Kyl Center which will help guide us through our next steps. A list of board members has been attached.
- We will be posting notes from the meeting at the Kyl Center blog: http://mi-waterforum.blogspot.com/ <http://mi-waterforum.blogspot.com/> . Please feel free to continue our discussions in this online forum.
- The aforementioned framework will be rolled out as part of the official launch of the Kyl Center at Morrison Institute’s State of Our State Conference and Luncheon taking place on November 14th, from 8 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. at the Phoenix Airport Marriott, 1101 N. 44thStreet. Click here to register for the event. The State of Our State program will feature a discussion of Arizona’s Water Future (and the initial work of the Kyl Center) moderated by Grady Gammage and featuring panelists Michael Lacey, Sharon Megdal, Steve Seleznow, and Kathy Ferris.
- Finally, the job posting for the Director of the Kyl Center is attached below. Please circulate this widely to anyone you feel might be a good candidate for this important position. Feel free to refer any names to me directly at Thom.Reilly@asu.edu.
| 9350BR | |
| Director | |
| Director - Kyl Center for Water Policy | |
| Campus: Downtown Phoenix | |
| Generic | |
| Morrison Inst For Publc Policy | |
| Full-Time | |
| VP/EXEC VICE PROV DPC | |
| Open | |
| This is not a grant funded position and is not contingent on future grant funding. | |
| 04 | |
| Depends on experience | |
| November 21, 2014 is the initial close date. Applications will continue to be accepted and considered every week until the search is closed. | |
In
expanding its role as a water research resource, Morrison Institute for
Public Policy at Arizona State University soon will be launching its
Kyl Center for Water Policy at Morrison Institute, which will serve both
water experts and the general public in addressing state and regional
water challenges.
While the specifics of the center are yet to be fully determined it will address the state’s most pressing water issues on an ongoing basis. To that end Morrison Institute is seeking an inaugural Director with broad-based knowledge of water-related issues in Arizona and the Southwest. | |
The individual who fills the position will be responsible for, but not limited to, the following job-related tasks:
| |
| Bachelor's degree in a field appropriate to the area of assignment AND eight (8) years of related administrative experience, which includes five (5) years of supervisory experience; OR, Twelve (12) years of related administrative experience, which includes five (5) years of supervisory experience; OR, Any equivalent combination of education and/or experience from which comparable knowledge, skills and abilities have been achieved. | |
| |
Activities
are performed in an environmentally controlled office setting subject
to extended periods of sitting, keyboarding and manipulating a computer
mouse; required to stand for varying lengths of time and walk moderate
distances to perform work. Occasional bending, reaching, lifting,
pushing and pulling up to 25 pounds. Regular activities require ability
to quickly change priorities, which may include and/or are subject to
resolution of conflicts. Ability to clearly communicate verbally, read,
write, see and hear to perform essential functions.
| |
| Morrison
Institute for Public Policy is a statewide leader in examining critical
issues for Arizona and the region, and is a catalyst for public
dialogue. An Arizona State University resource, Morrison Institute uses
nonpartisan research, analysis and public outreach to help improve the
state's quality of life. Morrison Institute was established in 1982 through a grant from Marvin and June Morrison of Gilbert, Arizona, in response to the state’s growing need for objective research on public policy issues. Through its history, Morrison Institute has conducted important work on topics that span education reform, water resources, health care, human services, urban growth, government structure, arts and culture, technology, quality of life, public finance, environment, sustainability, and economic development. | |
| Arizona
State University is a new model for American higher education, an
unprecedented combination of academic excellence, entrepreneurial energy
and broad access. This New American University is a single, unified
institution comprising four differentiated campuses positively impacting
the economic, social, cultural and environmental health of the
communities it serves. Its research is inspired by real world
application blurring the boundaries that traditionally separate academic
disciplines. ASU serves more than 80,000 students in metropolitan
Phoenix, Arizona, the nation's fifth largest city. ASU champions
intellectual and cultural diversity, and welcomes students from all
fifty states and more than one hundred nations across the globe. ASU is a tobacco-free university. For details visit www.asu.edu/tobaccofree Arizona State University is a VEVRAA Federal Contractor and an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer. All qualified applicants will be considered without regard to race, color, sex, religion, national origin, disability, protected veteran status, or any other basis protected by law. | |
| ASU conducts pre-employment screening which may include verification of work history, academic credentials, licenses, and certifications. | |
| This position is considered safety/security sensitive and will include a fingerprint check. Employment is contingent upon successful passing of the fingerprint check. | |
| Application deadline is 3:00PM Arizona time on the date indicated. Resumes should clearly illustrate how prior knowledge and experience meet the minimum and desired qualifications stated in this requisition. Only electronic applications are accepted. ASU does not pay for travel expenses associated with interviews, unless otherwise indicated. |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)